Save Institution Of Marriage
Wednesday, July 2, 2008 - Is dowry law serving its purpose? By Sumit Bhattacharjee: The Hindu
| Some people, including a section of legal fraternity, feel the Act is being misused |
VISAKHAPATNAM:
Legislations are made to safeguard the interests of certain sections of
society. And in tune with that, the Dowry Protection Act was amended in
1983 to give birth to IPC 498a. The idea was to add more teeth to the
Act to protect women from physical and psychological violence after
marriage. But, of late, a part of society, including a chunk of the
legal fraternity, feels that the Act is being misused. As per the
provision under IPC 498a, the police can arrest any person, be it the
husband, in-laws or distant relatives, whoever is mentioned in the
complaint filed by the married woman, without a warrant. The Act
prescribes non-bail-able warrant -- it is non-compoundable and treated
as a cognisable offence. "The 498a had come into force when the
concept of dowry had shaped into extortion and suicide and
bride-burning cases were rampant. But over the years, it seems to have
lost its purpose and is being used as a weapon by many women just to
harass their husbands and in-laws by fabricating cases," says D.V.
Subba Rao, advocate and former Chairman of Bar Council of India. 'A tool for extortion' An
affluent Marwari family, which was made to cough up Rs.30 lakhs
recently for settlement, claims that the Act has become a tool for
extortion. "The bride's family virtually held us for ransom till we
paid the amount. And in certain states like West Bengal and Bihar,
there are organised gangs who operate under the guise of social workers
to do the settlement. At any point of time, no decent family would like
its members to be arrested or sent for remand, and they are taking
advantage of that aspect of the Act. There seems to be nexus between
pressure groups β the police and the legal fraternity," says a member
of the family. Another lawyer P.A.K. Kishore points out that in
a family there is bound to be harmony and disharmony in the husband and
wife relationship. "But, unfortunately many women are fabricating cases
on trivial issues to get things done. If you do not take your
wife for a movie or to a restaurant, she can simply fabricate a case
the next day and get you arrested under the 498a section, and the
police will blindly arrest you without an inquiry or investigation,
since it is considered to be a cognisable offence. It is more common in
the urban set-up than in the rural areas. Everyday the court receives
at least one 498a case on an average," he says. The Act clearly
empowers the police to make arrest without investigation or
magistrate's order and is non-compoundable, leaving no space for
compromise at a later stage. Justice Malimath committee, in its
report, clearly indicated its misuse and recommended that it be made
compoundable and non-cognisable. A few states like Andhra Pradesh have already made it compoundable but it is still non-bailable and cognisable. However, K. Padma of Mahila Chetana says: "Every legislation is misused in one way or the other. Recently
the SC and ST Atrocities Act was misused against the editor of a
newspaper. Legislations are misused with the help of money and muscle
power. IPC 498a is a protective Act. And protective laws could prove to
be an angel for one and devil for the other. Since ages, it has been a
male-dominated society and people are afraid of women empowerment. This
Act should not be tampered with," she says. Rise in cases According
to a survey by NCRB (National Crime Records Bureau), while the number
of cases under 498a is on the rise, the conviction rate is barely 3 per
cent and over 1.17 lakh women were arrested in the last four years
under this section. "The irony is that the Act has been
actually introduced to save women from atrocities but more and more
women are being harassed," says Mr. Kishore. Many senior legal professionals favour that the section be made bailable, compoundable and non-cognisable.
Ms. K Padma, With
due respect , we strongly object your statement , that all law misused,
hence let allow the misuse of 498A and do not take any action.498A/DV
act is not a law like other LAW. This law do the extrotion of money
from the Husabnds family the way a terrorist do form the society. This
law denies the basic right of a human, let it be men or women. No
LAW in the IPC had been grossely misused like 498A till date and other
law realted to so called protection of Women. This are the LAWs which
gives the direct moneitery benifit to the women against her only
alligations without any evidence, let it be true or false. That is the
main resons or motivation to misuse the same and there is no direct
punishment. In
case of ST law also, the complintant do not get any free Money after
filling the complint. Free money is the main cause of mis use the law
like 498A or DV act etc. Further
, can you tell me why the TADA/POTA was changed? When the politician
face the problem the law changed, but when common people face the
problem , no action?
or You would like to suggest only
when the people will take the law in hand like burn the buses, block
the raod , strike, then only we should take action? SC never
termed any IPC law misuse like Legal Terrorism and ask the goverment to
take the necessary action in 498A, still Goverment is silent.
Further
, the law is such that , if the complain is true ( it is not like other
IPC) , the convection is 100% , as it need only the verbal statement of
the compalint , it is the accused have to prove the statements
are wrong . In that situaion also more than 90% people proved thier
innocence , but they had been arrested without any proper
investigations and thier evidence had not been considered at the time
of arrest , what you want to say , it is not a gross misuse?
Request
to Stop the promotion of Legal Terrorism, as in the whole IPC of India
or in the whole wrold there is no where such barbaric act there even in
ST law also , where a mens mother/sisters/samll child had been
arrested, inspite they are not present or lived with their shreemati
498a.
Your seccond part to calim that it is a men dominated
society and people afrid for women empowerement, is like giving the
excuse that I cant play the cricket as Sachin Tendulakar or
Dohni dominate the Indian team. At preseent there is no restrication
for any women to do the hard work and earn her living as per her talent
or capability. We do not know what our fathers fathers done and we are
not responsible for that and you can't punish us if at all they have
done any think worng.
It is not fair to calim that
we will demolish all masjid as some muslim king destroyed some temples
in past. Your view is only reflect a "male hater attitutude" and belive
to earn the free money without any hard work and enoy the lavish
lifestyle on others hard work. It is not men male dominated world or
never it had been, it is the maximum women prefered to take the role of
comfort and avoid the hard working and want to enjoy the hard works
frute of men. In addition to that it is the Grils family treat thier
daughter or sisters as a Barden , so if at all the Punishment should be
given it should be towards the Girls family , not against the Husbands
family.The truth is still more than 99% cases , it is the husbands or
his family providing the shelter/home/security to the women, not the
Girsl family. There is no work or any place available in India
where today women is not allowed to work or dominate with thier
excellence. If you know, tell us we will destroy the same, let it be
IT/Politics/Ministry or labour field. This country wittness of Women
Prime minsiters , it all about her capability and the girls parent's do
thier job honestly and do not think that the girls are burden for them. Still more than 90% hard work job like army, labour, riskwalabal are men.. why women do not demand reservations there? Avoiding
to take the responsibility to be changed in women's mind, if they want
the so called gender equality , today women are not abala nari.. they
are killing the man, they are throwing the acid, they are killing the
child, they are doing smallagings, they are eqalll part to drink, break
galss in pub, adultrity.. no where any restrictions for today's women.
Let make the law gender eaull , if you fell women do not do the crime
.Can you? or You belive the pain of a mother/sisters is less when
she loss her son or brother and the same to be termed as social service
in this country? For your ready reference :
Data of Crime Bure 2006 498A and 304B:
Data of Crime Bure 2006 498A and 304B: No. of Person Arrested under (498A +304B) : 161217 Child/Senior citizen/Women arrested :280/4700/31253 No. Of person Arrested Under 304B : 24562 No. of Person Arrested Only under 498A (living women) : 137180 No. Of person Not Charge sheeted : 31128 No. Of person Charge Sheeted : 125277 No. Of person's Trial Completed : 78292 No. Of person convicted (498A+304B) : 16995 No. Of Person Convicted by 304B : 5144 No. Of person Convicted Under 498A but not 304B : NA? No. Of person Proved Innocence at Court under 498A : 61297 No. Person's case compunded or withdrawn : 13970 No. Of person Convicted only under 498A without 304B : NA ? No.
Of person Accused under 498A and harresed to Got AB/ArrestStay and
Trail not recomended, at least 5 times more 8,05,000 : NA
? ( 8,05,000 ) On an average (3+19.3) = 22.3% people's case
(4812+31128) =35,940/- had not been even charge sheeted and proved
innocence before trail. It is a clear example that approx 80% cases
people proved their innocence at Court that they had been arrested
without any reason/evidence as 498A/304B is non-bailable and do not
need any evidence to arrest any TOM/Dick or Marry . So, it is a
clear example that more than 92.3% cases the people had been arrested
under 498A without any evidence, where as if the case is true and the
verbal statement of the compliment itself find true, the convection is
100%. Still in this special LAW more than 92.3% People proved their
innocence, where as in normal IPC the convection is more than such LAW,
then why need this special LAW? The Answer : To do the Legal
Terrorism and earn the money from Husband's Family as a whole sale free
license and openly Blackmail and do the extortion of money by Wives
family in front of Police/Court/Media and the same is not to be termed
as crime. We wonder Whose life is in More Danger in India : Men or Women?
To understand the reason one must Know: Women "Engineering viewpoint"
Crime Bure data 2005 : Married Men Sucide : 52k vs Married Women Sucide 28K.Still there is no LAW to Protect Men why?
2006 Crime Bure Data : Married Men Sucide:55452 vs. Married Women Sucide:29.869
Will
Our LAW Maker change the LAW 304B( dowry death) to 304C( Sowry Death)
and 498A ( harrasement to wife) to 498B ( Sowry harrasement by wife)
Disclimer :This is totally writer personnel Views only. You may have different opinion. The name and place changed to protect the Persons Identity.
|
|
|