| |
P I L Against Dowry Prohibition Act (IPC-498A)
By accident i found a public Interest litigation on one of the men support group site
http://mynation.net/pil/pil.php
These men trying to file a PIL, against ONLY women support law against DOWRY.
these men trying to scrap this 498A. This law is scraped then no women is safe, or we cann`t trap men with any other law.
so i call all women and make sure at any cost this Law will stay.
Sunita.
Update Wednesday, November 30, 2005
|
| |
scared....?
To brave women sunita.
i think you look scared after checking that PIL and many signatures..
soon we will succeed in scarping this notorious 498A.
and we will make gender equality and harmony in indian family life.
we do not demand like NCW, domestic violence Bill,
we men ask domestic harmony bills.
Crusader
for:saveindianfamily.org
|
| By Anonymous
Date Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Link |
Untitled Comment
To Sunita,
Let me share your worry over this issue. Please accept my sympathy. I know women don't have capability, talent and maturity and to can sustain in the society, they need to misuse laws. Thousands of women have misused this law 498A and millions have suffered. It is really unfortunate that women had never expected that men will fight back and ruin all their plans and future conspiracy in the society. Please accept my sympathy for those women who will soon be punished with 3 years imprisonment for filing a false complaint against anybody. Women should be protected and respected for their modesty and dignity. That is exactly we are doing here, we are protecting mother and sisters, and punishing those who will harass our mother and sisters by misusing the laws. Now its your decision whether you want us to protect your dignity and modesty or you want us to send you to jail for misusing laws. Choice is yours. I advise not to misuse laws or else we will send you to jail for good.
|
| By Anonymous
Date Thursday, December 1, 2005
Link |
Read it if you are sister or mother
Sunita,
You need to understand that today misuse of 498 A is causing maximum effect to pragnent sisters, old age mothers and sister in laws with small kids. We are up for preventing misuse of this act. If the act is really good for women then why conviction is only 2%?? why most of the cases end with husband's family paying large sums to wife and her family. I am victim of this act and can swear by anything in this world that case was 100% false but no one listened. My old mother, ill sister had to go through this. Is this fair? Let's try to understand the situation in totality and vouch for preventing misuse of this act.
|
| By Anonymous
Date Friday, December 2, 2005
Link |
Senceless Activism and Sencelss Comments.
Women like Sunita can not be good sister or good mother.
She can not face the realities of life.
She appears to be mentally sick person.
She is simply a man hater....A man without whom she could
not have even born.
She is joking on the efforts made by organisation, which is trying
to get relief for innocent victims of social laws, by legal means.
She is against the efforts which may be good for health of the society.
Let her speak and explain as to what she or her feminist's groups or
the NCW have done for 75000 Women Bar Girls made to starve in
Mumbai who are now moving out to Banglore for their livilihood.
Let them talk about Millions of prostitutes who are responsible for
out break of AIDS in India.
Why prostitution which is considered as degrading profession world
over is still legal in India?
The number of alleged dowry victim women is not that massive.
The outcome in dowry cases has shown that 2% women are real
victims of dowry menace and 98% women are simply scroudrels,
blackmailers and extortionists.
These scoundrels are worst than prostitutes who call themselves,
sex workers and work for fixed rate and do not blackmail.
Persons like Sunita must understand that there is
"Natural Gender Difference" and the laws of the Nature.
Why then the "Prostituton" and "Dancing Girls" is the oldest
profession of Women and not of Men?
|
| By Anonymous
Date Friday, December 9, 2005
Link |
|
|