Press release 19th April, 2008 , Press Club of India (Delhi) .
By Gender Human Rights Society ( Regd.) NGO . www.ghrs.in
A detailed memorandum regarding the evil DV LAW ( Protection of women from Domestic Violence act , 2005, effective from Oct 2006) will be given on the day of press conference to Law ministry, and copy to other relevant officials. Some of our demands about DV Law in short are .
* Service providers and protection officers should be neutral and not women rights activists only ( Rule 2006 ) .
* Protect Batra Vs Batra Supreme court Judgent. Do not through old persons out of own houses by DV Law.
* Scrap DV Law, there are already sufficient legal provisions. Or review of DV Law by including organizations fighting for preventing misuse of bad women Laws.
* Remove section 19 , that allows all men of costiliest house a women lived anytime in past, to be thrown on roads, by saying potentiality of verbal abuse.
* Remove maintenace from DV Law section 20 , there are existing maintenance Laws . People now are wasting time in fighting 3 maintenance cases. (Meet victims at press conference) .
* Remove section 22, money for mental trouble complaint leads to false complaints .
* Complainant women never have to sign in DV Law, this encourages fasle allegations. To hide this and other important facts from anyone reading the DV Law a few times only, like parliament members or press, elaborate arrangements have been made by the evil drafters of the DV Law. Women should sign the complaint .
* Allow a man to speak his point of view at least, remove Rule 2006 .14.5 .,infact remove rule 14
* Plug loopholes that make it easy to illegally change the Domestic Incident report in DV Law.
Delhi High Court Judge R.K Gauba says Domestic Violence Law a recipe for disaster in his detailed article in practical Lawyer. We salute his courage to take on powerful radical feminists.
Should we allow wrong radical feminists laws like IPC Section 498A( Dowry) , DV, destroy the only source of social security we have in India, which is the family? Should we hope that our Government will invent a better system than family to take care of the countless single mothers, fatherless children and helpless senior citizens it is creating, and if so, at what additional cost to the society? How many more innocent lives should we sacrifice before our Government and law enforcement system take steps to end legal terrorism of radical feminists new Law proposals and promote family-friendly laws. Which protect victims of Legal terrorism ?.
Sandeep Bhartia,
President
|