If you say something with statistics, chances of passing the editing is higher.
Prepare a well writen starting speach .
Feminist : Only in extreme cases, a women goes to court or police.
Reply : 1 in 6 in delhi will face 498a. So this is common and not rare as told by you feminists. Looks like these people are living in 5 years back times, when such wrong new LAWs etc. were not present.
F : When you bring a wife in house, that is her house also. Wifes do not have rights as that of tenant also. When you beat her, then you do not think, that this can happen.
R : Laws give extra maintenance for house rent, the LAW's aim is to give incentive for wife's to break marriages, saying if you break marriage, you will get the costiliest house of friend or relative of husband. Are women who live with husbands not real women, worthy of living in houses.
F: Poem Women will tolerate no more.
R : Write a poetry .
Lighter poem, like men are good
or strong poem like Feminists will ensure that 1/3 children in suffer in fatherless families. Do false studies that fatherless children are much better. Through all old people to suffer in Old age homes. If you do not do lap dance , then you are not a women, as per some feminists thinking ? proof?
A : Old persons have lived their life, so why do they need house.
R: You have full life left, you earn, and do not take house by Domestic Violence act .
F : The Judges has to see that misuse do not take place, a man will be given chance to say his point of view. He can apeal.
R: LAW is clear judge to pass orders just on the basis of affadavid filed by the women. He can file ex partee order.
AI : Study required to fine tune facts.
Also if the LAW practically says, potentiality of verbal abuse is sufficient to through husband out of his own house, then what can the judge do. Section 19 .
Sucide statistics :
F : Police says, are these men committing sucides due to marriage, I have not seen any sucide note .
R : ( I could have given ) : Sir, I can show you, 30 cases of sucide by husband due to wife, they are in my hand at present. Sucide notes by husband are also present in significant of these cases. From next time , you can not say that I have not seen any suside by husband due to matrimonial cases.
AI : Collect sucide by husband cases . Any sucide notes .
SIF : 98 % husband face domestic violence , study by SIF .
Police person says : I have never seen a case of husband complaining of wife doing domestic violence with him.
R : We get cases , husband is bleeding, due to beatings by wife. When he asks his lawyer, lawyer says, if you say she beats you, there is no LAW for you, she will say it is husband who is beating me, and you would be trouble. What if she hits herself, and says husband hit her, you would be in unnecessary trouble.
AI : Collect some police complaints by husbands , saying wife beating him.
** Golden opportunity : I got by a chance to talk to the anchor before the show along with Swarup and Gurudarshan. These 2 minutes were sufficient to clearify the points of "this is a costiliest house occupation bill and called domestic violence bill to fool the press. " She understood that if LAW already gives a wife extra maintenance to rent a house, based on the status of house husband is living, then it looks slightly wrong to give the costiliest house to wife.
result was in discussions she favoured us, by saying this old women is driven out of own house due to LAW, I am sure there are other similar cases, what do this old women do.
So if I(we ) can get a few minutes in private with the anchor, and TV producer etc. they can start editing to help us and not edit to help feminists .
** AI Women team list for discussions is required . After all this LAWs are being made by women who have failed relationships. Good women or those who live with husband are suffering. They looked disturbed and started distorting things when the old women's story came, Indra Jaising said false her son is with the daughter in LAW.
|
• Sunday, November 4, 2007 - My observations...
But such types of presentation is what affects the general public much more....
Thus speaking of learnings from the DD program, I'd say:
1. Our members were certainly prepared with facts, but not at all with presentation techniques, which is what makes you more effective with the audience.
2. Only women can fight with women, men cannot, atleast not in public. Its natural law. So when men shout in front of women, the only reaction you get is what you got there... "Being labeled as low self-esteemed, low confidence, etc..."
3. Even the high percentage of NO's in the SMS poll only proves their point that "men can't tolerate women asking for their rights...".
4. Did you see the sarcastic facial and vocal expressions of the host when looking at, talking to or even referring to our members as against with the feminazis? Watch the video again, in case you missed those... Their intentions were crystal clear!
Frankly, I don't really consider this show a victory for SIF movement... We still have a long way to go... Its too early to rejoice with false hopes!
The need of the hour is to accept the reality and work smarter (not just harder) to get to the goal...
Long live Indian Family!