Gender Justice
• Monday, March 26, 2007 - 2007 : sexual harressment. brief comments
|
Partial reading of the 2007 version and some comments :
Most points are the same.
The Constitution of Internal Complaints Committee :
(2) The Committee shall consist of the following members namely:-
(a) a Chairperson, from amongst employees, who shall be a senior level woman, committed to the cause of women. In case a senior level woman employee is not available, the Chairperson shall be appointed from a sister organization or a non-governmental organization;
(b) not less than two members from amongst employees committed to the cause of women or who have had experience in social work; and
(c) one member from amongst such non-governmental organisations or associations or other interests committed to the cause of women, as may be specified:
Provided that atleast fifty per cent of the members so nominated shall be women.
Similarly the district level committees will be made mainly from so called women "committed to the cause of women" . To fit in this defination you have to write one sided articles, views etc. if you dare to tell the truth about both a man and a women, you no longer are someone "committed to the cause of women" so no longer a judge. So what kind of judgements we will get from these committees is easy to guess for everyone.
Why normal women can not be made members and chairperson of these committees. Can they not understand the feelings of men and women. Are these normal men and women not intelligent enough to decide if a behaviour is correct or not, and to decide the truth from false. Why is it compulsory for the chairperson women to be "committed to the cause of women", then only she can become the chairperson. Most of these so called women "committed to the cause of women" are from failed relationships, are so can not be said to be best in behaviour or relations matters. They can be made part of committee, but to reserve the post of chairperson to these women by LAW is insult to other women, our mothers in successful relationships with men. Is it that only women committed to the cause of women can understand the feelings of women and men. Are other normal men and women not inteligent enough to decide if a behaviour is correct or not.
"committed to the cause of women" for chairperson and others must be removed.
This law is a ploy to instigate the women workers to become "committed to the so called cause of women" to get admission in this powerful committee, due to posts reserved for them. If you tell the truth and not one sided distorted views, you no longer fit enough to be a judge in these powerful committees. More false distorted articles you can write the better "committed to the so called cause of women" you become and get better posts and money from WCD and NCW etc. loads of Govt. money. Why truthful women like our mothers in successful relationships can not get this money, why only distorted picture presenters get this money.
The aim is to get wrong judgements as the committee members are selected based on if they distort and give one sided views only or not.
It is vey important that LAw makes it compulsory that 50% members of these committees should be men. It is important for more and more men to see the injustice being done by women in these judgements, so that they come to know of the truth and lose the sympathy that they have for these type of women. There are 2 persons involved 1 a man and 1 a women so mens participation is a must. With so much of Govt. money being given to feminists writers , it is difficult for press to tell the truth anyways.
The bill still focus on extracting money. This is wrong to give money for sexual harressment. Reasonable punishment can be their, if proved guilty, but no money please to instigate and trap by false sexual harressment complaints. That also with such a committee , for becoming a member of which, you have to lie and say one sided women related things only.
The law proposal says do not disclose the case details if it is proved that a false sexual harressment complaint was made, but disclose the details to press ( publish them etc) if the complaint was found correct and man punished.
This is wrong the details of false complaints received should also be published. Also details of complaints that could not be proved.
|
Post A Comment!
|
|
|
|
About Me
Recent Posts
• For General Public's Information
• PIL pros and Cons
• Activists development stages
• DV Law Memorandum , for review
• Case , DV Haryana
• Case House old
• Case Amit
• Mother forced to leave own house .
• GHRS + Old persons NGO press release
• Old persons Press conference 19th April 08
• GHRS press release 19th April Conferense
• Invitation DV Old persons Press conference
• DV Seniour Citizen memorandum
• Memorandom about DV Law from Old persons Press conference
• Irrevocable breakdown of marriage for Divorce
• Dharna, Seminar Checklist .
• Lying is required to get Jobs in Domestic Violence LAW. Renuka Chaudhary caught lying, as expected .
• woman organization are not woman organizations at all, they are vindctive wives organization
• What kind of a fool will rent house to a feminist .
• Massive human rights abuses of men, domestic violence LAws
• Mens Day , first cut thoughts .
• in spreading the menace of legal terrorism who is the biggest culprit
• Liearnings from DD debate .
• Press release Men Cell and SFF. 26th Oct Seminar cum Dharna
• Domestic Violence Law – A Recipe For Disaster?
• Satire film by Udit , Nakul.
• Serial recorded by Udit, Nakul.
• Is Sucide is the only option left to inocent Husbands ?
• Sexual harressment LAW proposal, detailed 10 page document
• Name for NEW NGO, divorce and other more strong demands
• 3 wrongs with sexual harressment LAW proposal
• Adoption LAW should be made equal for men.
• How feminists destroy marriages
Links
• Home
• View my profile
• Archives
|
|