The Law says 1000's of contract posts, at every district etc. are reserved for Women rights activist. So we say if you want this job, and more then a judge's power, you have to give false distorted one sided picture favoring women in press, else you no longer remain a women's rigts activists and lose job and power. Press needs articles, statistics. If you can not gives distored statistics by distorted questions, by doing survey at places you know the results will be biased, or just giving false statistics like Govt. funded feminists organizations, you no longer are a women's rights actiists, lose the power of this contract Job, and less money from Ministry of women and child development in future also. The question is reserving all these posts for Women rights activists, whose defination does not say that she has to do justice to everyone, but tend to say get maximum for the women, even if the fault is of the women, is this correct for everyone in society, for truthful picture to come out of Govt. departments, and for human race in total.

Delibrately the defination of a women's rights activists is not mentioned properly. Then who are these large number of posts with arguably more powers then a judge resrved for( see challenging this for man is very difficult, compared to challenging a judge's order).

Also all statistics collection for this new law of workplace sexual harressment, will be done only by women rights activists and not neutral persons what to say of men's rights activists. So this gives a good way to brainwash press.

Press require news, and only one with the data will be women rights activists. If some women right activist tries to tell the truth data, do unbiased survey questions or unbiased data reporting she immediately becomes not a womens rights activists and so is removed from the contract job. If you want job and power, say false women side. The more distort the picture you can present to press the better women's rights activists you are, you get more powers more money. In the process truth and society wellbeing suffers, but that is what feminist of Ministry of Women and child development i.e. the law makers, and the story copying press wants. Or am I missing their point of view about why is this type of reservation, and not involving men's rights activists required.

IN point 19, Providing funds to the womens rights activists is not made clear, while travel expences is mentioned, other expenses like DA etc, looks like are delibrately not made clear. To breed more young feminists all these women rights activists are again given powers to employ more persons.

Wrong 2: (5) As and when deemed necessary, the Local officer may appoint Special officers at district / block level to receive complaints and to perform all others tasks .

Only God can help India and humanity from new Feminists laws.